Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » IPv6 » ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1249
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
« IPV6 as tunnle for more IPV4 URLs?  
AuthorAll Replies

ajmas

join:2008-04-14
Canada


1 edit
 ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

I am trying to update the following page on ISPs providing IPv6 addresses to their customers:

»https://www.sixxs.net/wiki/IPv6_Enabled_···roviders

Does anyone know whether there are others not on the list that could be added?

BTW the page is not for tunnel listing tunnel providers.


justbits
More fiber than ATT can handle
Premium
join:2003-01-08
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Midwest
·AT&T Yahoo

How about adding a 6to4 list too?
Several providers have 6to4, although some go through non-optimal paths. (AT+T DSL in my area goes through Sweden.

Sprint supposedly has IPv6 routing, but I don't know if they offer it to customers or not.
»sprintv6.net/aspath/bgp.html
»www.sprintv6.net/Sprintv6.html
"Sprint is currently working on its product offering to include a native dual-stack support for Dedicated IP Access, planned to debut in early 2008."

ajmas

join:2008-04-14
Canada

It could be added, but I would rather see 6to4 on a separate page. The general idea of the page is to list ISPs providing IPv6 without requiring customers to do extra work. Basically this would help anyone wanting to find an ISP which provides 'native' IPv6 support.

The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page.


visitor

join:2001-07-26
Manchester, CT

said by ajmas See Profile :

The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page.
I agree the ISP's that support a 6to4 environment should be added to a different page then ISP's that support dual stack handoff to the CPE.

In Connecticut,USA I've seen that www.netplex.net has advertised a /32 but I don't know if they are providing v6 addresses to their customers.

»www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-r···=2.0&v=6
Forums » Up and Running » IPv6« IPV6 as tunnle for more IPV4 URLs?  


Wednesday, 11-Nov 00:12:39 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [125] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [95] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [86] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [67] Government Will Release Some Telco Wiretap Lobbying Documents
· [62] Verizon's Hanging Up On Rural America
· [49] Verizon's Higher ETFs Annoy Senator
· [34] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [32] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [24] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· [Rant] windows 7 is the most retarded os ever and its broke to [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Slow speed lately? [TekSavvy]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· Massive Slowdowns? [cover,1584]